Difference between Procedural, Structured, and Object-Oriented Programming

By: Jagan Viewed: 173 times  Printer Friendly Format    


Until recently, programs were thought of as a series of procedures that acted upon data. A procedure, or function, is a set of specific instructions executed one after the other. The data was quite separate from the procedures, and the trick in programming was to keep track of which functions called which other functions, and what data was changed. To make sense of this potentially confusing situation, structured programming was created.

The principle idea behind structured programming is as simple as the idea of divide and conquer. A computer program can be thought of as consisting of a set of tasks. Any task that is too complex to be described simply would be broken down into a set of smaller component tasks, until the tasks were sufficiently small and self-contained enough that they were easily understood.

As an example, computing the average salary of every employee of a company is a rather complex task. You can, however, break it down into these subtasks:

1. Find out what each person earns.

2. Count how many people you have.

3. Total all the salaries.

4. Divide the total by the number of people you have.

Totaling the salaries can be broken down into

1. Get each employee's record.

2.
Access the salary.

3.
Add the salary to the running total.

4.
Get the next employee's record.

In turn, obtaining each employee's record can be broken down into

1. Open the file of employees.

2.
Go to the correct record.

3.
Read the data from disk.

Structured programming remains an enormously successful approach for dealing with complex problems. By the late 1980s, however, some of the deficiencies of structured programing had became all too clear.

First, it is natural to think of your data (employee records, for example) and what you can do with your data (sort, edit, and so on) as related ideas.

Second, programmers found themselves constantly reinventing new solutions to old problems. This is often called "reinventing the wheel," and is the opposite of reusability. The idea behind reusability is to build components that have known properties, and then to be able to plug them into your program as you need them. This is modeled after the hardware world--when an engineer needs a new transistor, she doesn't usually invent one, she goes to the big bin of transistors and finds one that works the way she needs it to, or perhaps modifies it. There was no similar option for a software engineer.


New Term: The way we are now using computers--with menus and buttons and windows--fosters a more interactive, event-driven approach to computer programming. Event-driven means that an event happens--the user presses a button or chooses from a menu--and the program must respond. Programs are becoming increasingly interactive, and it has became important to design for that kind of functionality.

Old-fashioned programs forced the user to proceed step-by-step through a series of screens. Modern event-driven programs present all the choices at once and respond to the user's actions.

Object-oriented programming attempts to respond to these needs, providing techniques for managing enormous complexity, achieving reuse of software components, and coupling data with the tasks that manipulate that data.

The essence of object-oriented programming is to treat data and the procedures that act upon the data as a single "object"--a self-contained entity with an identity and certain characteristics of its own.



Most Viewed Articles (in C++ )

Latest Articles (in C++)

Comment on this tutorial

Subscribe to Tutorials

Related Tutorials

Archived Comments

1. I find dis site very educating
View Tutorial          By: Kensho at 2009-05-09 05:18:57

2. This is almost word-for-word identical to what I j
View Tutorial          By: MelTorefas at 2009-09-23 03:02:52

3. it is good site , and i have cleared my doubts
View Tutorial          By: imtiaz at 2009-10-15 23:43:50

4. really helpfull and gets all the stuff what u want
View Tutorial          By: yash at 2009-10-25 12:28:57

5. Great Description. Helped a lot.
View Tutorial          By: Dee2019nc at 2009-11-08 18:26:22

6. this site is really very useful.
it provide

View Tutorial          By: ankush bansal at 2009-11-12 08:34:13

7. great material for language bugs....
View Tutorial          By: manoj kapri at 2009-11-30 00:30:13

8. is very fantacy
View Tutorial          By: sas at 2009-12-16 02:03:46

9. Thanks a ton sir.....
This is very informat

View Tutorial          By: Shailaja at 2009-12-27 10:43:42

10. Its a peshak site
View Tutorial          By: SANIJ at 2010-01-06 22:40:31

11. plz show me my answers
View Tutorial          By: Debnita Saha at 2010-05-01 05:15:16

12. i have been searching for this result for more tha
View Tutorial          By: nithin at 2010-08-08 12:55:18

13. This is very clear and explains the concepts in a
View Tutorial          By: Reite at 2011-02-18 13:55:07

14. Such a nice site for clear and explains the concep
View Tutorial          By: Sandeep at 2011-05-22 06:34:42

15. It may be good ,when you stressed on the point why
View Tutorial          By: Kishore Mylavarapu at 2011-05-25 01:28:50

16. Is site ki badolat main C++ mein paas ho gya !
View Tutorial          By: sharif at 2011-08-06 10:06:31

17. very useful site..easy to understand the concept h
View Tutorial          By: snigdha at 2012-03-29 05:45:04

18. this is really very useful because of this site i
View Tutorial          By: meenakshi shukla at 2012-09-15 05:09:49

19. Awesome article. It's very useful. Despite it didn
View Tutorial          By: Matheus at 2015-02-24 12:06:05

20. great material for language
View Tutorial          By: hafiz at 2015-03-24 12:18:45

21. suprbb man,,,mazaaa aa gya
View Tutorial          By: suraj bhatt at 2016-01-08 02:49:12